Deep Dives Gut and Immunity

When someone asks about leaky gut: what the question is really asking, and what to do with it

Take a barrier conviction seriously without endorsing an unvalidated test: where permeability genuinely rises, the differential that actually explains these presentations, why coeliac testing depends on the order of events, and the red flags that end the conversation.

Written by a working longevity centre, not a marketplace

Reviewed by Team SOMA
Last updated August 2026 · English

What you'll be able to do

  • Where intestinal permeability genuinely rises, and what it is evidence of when it does
  • Why the common permeability tests do not carry the weight put on them
  • The differential that actually explains these presentations
  • Why coeliac testing depends on the order in which things were done
  • The red flags that end this conversation and start a different one

What's inside

Before you read

The deep reading

The case

Check yourself

In practice

Is this for you?

Who it's for

  • Anyone with a result in hand who wants the reasoning, not only the conclusion
  • People with no medical training - every technical term is explained the moment it appears
  • Practitioners who want the thinking behind a number rather than a protocol

What you need

  • No prior training. Every technical term is explained in plain words the first time it appears.
  • A willingness to read something twice.

About this Deep Dive

Someone arrives convinced their gut is leaking. Dismissing the conviction loses the person; endorsing the test they have brought endorses something that does not hold up. The useful move is neither of those.

What this covers

  • Where intestinal permeability genuinely rises, and what it is evidence of when it does
  • Why the common permeability tests do not carry the weight put on them
  • The differential that actually explains these presentations
  • Why coeliac testing depends on the order in which things were done
  • The red flags that end this conversation and start a different one

How it is built

Five parts, taken in order: a short orientation, the reading itself, one worked case, a check to see whether it landed, and a page on what changes once you have it. About forty minutes, and it is written to be read twice. There is no certificate here — that is what the Certified Programmes are for.

Who wrote it

SL
SOMA Longevity Sciences

Ratings

No ratings yet.

Where to go next

Chosen for this page
Scroll to Top