Deep Dives Ozone and Regenerative Therapies

Ozone in practice: dose, route, and the screening that comes first

How a course of ozone is actually reasoned about: the arithmetic that makes two protocols comparable, why the interval between sessions is part of the dose, the screening that has to come first, and how to recognise unsafe practice from outside the room.

Written by a working longevity centre, not a marketplace

Reviewed by Team SOMA
Last updated August 2026 · English

What you'll be able to do

  • The arithmetic that makes two protocols comparable
  • Why the interval between sessions is part of the dose, not a scheduling detail
  • The screening that has to come first, and what it is screening for
  • How unsafe practice is recognisable from outside the room
  • Where the evidence supports use, where it is thin, and where there is none

What's inside

Before you read

The deep reading

The case

Check yourself

In practice

Is this for you?

Who it's for

  • Anyone with a result in hand who wants the reasoning, not only the conclusion
  • People with no medical training - every technical term is explained the moment it appears
  • Practitioners who want the thinking behind a number rather than a protocol

What you need

  • No prior training. Every technical term is explained in plain words the first time it appears.
  • A willingness to read something twice.

About this Deep Dive

Two ozone protocols can look completely different on paper and deliver the same dose, or look identical and not. The arithmetic that settles it is simple, and it is the part most descriptions leave out.

What this covers

  • The arithmetic that makes two protocols comparable
  • Why the interval between sessions is part of the dose, not a scheduling detail
  • The screening that has to come first, and what it is screening for
  • How unsafe practice is recognisable from outside the room
  • Where the evidence supports use, where it is thin, and where there is none

This is written to explain how the field reasons. It is not instruction to seek or to give treatment, and nothing here is a promise about an outcome.

How it is built

Five parts, taken in order: a short orientation, the reading itself, one worked case, a check to see whether it landed, and a page on what changes once you have it. About forty minutes, and it is written to be read twice. There is no certificate here — that is what the Certified Programmes are for.

Who wrote it

SL
SOMA Longevity Sciences

Ratings

No ratings yet.

Where to go next

Chosen for this page
Scroll to Top